Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: CONCLUSIONS
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

ERDC TN-DOER-C16
July 2000
CONCLUSIONS: A leachate screening protocol is being developed that considers the entire
leachate pathway from the dredged material (source) through the CDF, foundation (vadose zone),
and the saturated zone to the receptors. The protocol is based on the theoretical considerations
presented in this technical note. The approach taken consists of three steps:
1) Evaluate the source strength for its potential to generate pore water with unacceptable levels
of contaminants and identify the contaminants of concern (those that may pose a leachate
problem) based on equilibrium partitioning between the dredged material solids and the pore
water. Screening values for unacceptable concentrations would be based on the receptors.
2) Evaluate the attenuation by adsorption/retardation of contaminants of concern in the CDF
and vadose zone and determine which contaminants may pose a leachate problem beyond
the vadose zone. For screening, relationships among the controlling factors in the CDF and
vadose zone and the attenuation of leachate concentration will be developed using the
HELPQ model.
3) Evaluate the diffusion (dilution) of the remaining contaminants of concern in the saturated
zone between the CDF and the receptor. For screening, relationships among the controlling
factors in the saturated zone and the attenuation of leachate concentration will be developed
using the MEPAS model and the GMS.
POINTS OF CONTACT: For additional information, contact the author, Dr. Paul R. Schroeder,
(601-634-3709, schroep@wes.army.mil) or the Program Manager of the Dredging Operations and
Environmental Research Program, Dr. Robert M. Engler, (601-634-3624, englerr@wes.army.mil).
This technical note should be cited as follows:
Schroeder, P. R. (2000). "Leachate screening considerations," DOER Technical Notes
Collection (ERDC TN-DOER-C16), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development
Center, Vicksburg, MS. www.wes.army.mil/el/dots/doer
REFERENCES
Aziz, N. M., and Schroeder, P. R. (1999). "Documentation of the Hydrologic Evaluation of Leachate Production and
Quality (HELPQ) module," Environmental Effects of Dredging Technical Notes (Dredging Research Technical
Note  EEDP-06-20),  U.S.  Army  Engineer  Waterways  Experiment  Station,  Vicksburg,  MS.
www.wes.army.mil/el/dots/eedptn.html
Bahr, J. M., and Rubin, J. (1987). "Direct comparison of kinetic and local equilibrium formulations for solute transport
affected by surface reactions," Water Resources Research 23(3), 438-452.
Brannon, J. M., Myers, T. E., and Price, C. B. (1990). "Factors affecting the behavior of metals in leachate,"
Environmental Effects of Dredging Technical Notes EEDP-02-13, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment
Station, Vicksburg, MS. www.wes.army.mil/el/dots/eedptn.html
Brannon, J. M., Myers, T. E., and Tardy, B. A. (1994). "Leachate testing and evaluation for freshwater sediments,"
Miscellaneous Paper D-94-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Brannon, J. M., Myers, T. E., Gunnison, D., and Price, C. B. (1991). "Non-constant PCB partitioning in New Bedford
Harbor sediment during sequential batch leaching," Environmental Science and Technology 45(6),1082-1087.
14

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business