Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Physical Properties and Engineering Behavior
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

ERDC TN-DOER-D1
August 2004
Physical Properties and Engineering Behavior. The most common physical property
needed for dredged material characterization is the grain-size distribution, based on either the
weight (which is the standardized method) or volume measurement. The material classification is
then selected using the grain-size distribution and the Atterberg limit criteria. Other material
properties include water content, specific gravity, organic content, bulk density, percent solids,
and void ratio. Engineering behavior properties include shear strength, consolidation behavior,
hydraulic conductivity (permeability), critical erosion stress, and viscosity.
Undisturbed native soil and rock materials exhibit mechanical properties that are influenced by
the material structure. Intergranular bonding and physico-chemical effects influence the materi-
al's behavior (Mitchell 1993). As the water content in the material matrix is increased during
remolding and the solid particles become more separated, the material behaves more like a slurry
or suspension, and the intergranular bonding forces decrease. As the bonding and cohesive forces
decrease, the resulting shear strength decreases. If fine-grained particles (silt and clay) constitute
more than about 35 percent of the total matrix solids, the slurry will behave as a viscous material
(Spigolon 1993). Fibrous materials, high organic content, and gas bubbles are known to affect
the shear strength behavior of high-water-content soils (Klein and Sarsby 2000, Edil and Wang
2000). Examining the rheological behavior of soil slurries is not a traditional geotechnical topic,
and standardized laboratory tests for determining the engineering properties of soil slurries have
yet to be developed.
One objective for determining the engineering properties of soil slurry during nearshore dredging
operations is to establish the navigation channel bottom location (horizon) when clayey sus-
pended sediments are surficial to the channel bottom (Teeter 1992). The slurry threshold (yield)
shear stress (or the amount of stress imposed on the material to initiate its movement) is deter-
mined as a function of slurry density and viscosity for a given sediment, and the nautical horizon
is chosen based on established procedures (Dasch and Wurpts 2001). DeMeyer and Mahlerbe
(1987) determined that the threshold (yield) shear stress of most clayey slurries is less than 2 psf
(10 Pa), with in situ bulk densities of 72 to 84 pcf (1.15 to 1.35 kg/l). As the sediment consoli-
dates and develops a higher density and threshold (yield) shear stress beyond its rheological
behavior range, the geotechnical concept of effective stress (Terzaghi 1953) has been shown to
govern and describe the material's physical and mechanical behavior.
Another reason for determining the properties of soil slurries is to quantify slurry strength during
nearshore or contaminated dredged material placement operations. For example, when placing a
sand cap over contaminated dredged materials, the engineering behavior of the dredged material
must be predicted or known in order to achieve successful cap placement. If the soft dredged
material has insufficient shear strength to resist the imposed cap stress, failure will occur and the
purpose of the cap will be defeated. As the soft dredged material is allowed to consolidate from a
slurry state into a non-zero effective stress state, its ability to resist imposed stresses will signifi-
cantly increase. This phenomenon of strength increase was observed at a subaqueous capping
site by Myre et al. (2000), where the soft dredged material was allowed to consolidate for about
5 months before it achieved a shear strength of about 20 psf (1 kPa), which allowed subsequent
successful cap placement.
Measuring the Physical Properties and Engineering Behavior of Dredged Materi-
als. When fine-grained dredged material is remolded from a soft and highly compressible soil
2

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business