Figure 11. Cumulative grain size distribution (by weight) curves for pre- dredged and post-placed material samples after mechanical dredging and dump scow placement

ERDC TN-DOER-D2

September 2004

Figure 11. Cumulative grain size distribution (by weight) curves for pre- dredged and post-placed mate-

rial samples after mechanical dredging and dump scow placement

Figure 12. Frequency grain size distribution (by weight) curves for pre- dredged and post-placed mate-

rial samples after mechanical dredging and dump scow placement

The Atterberg limits of the two materials are similar (LL = 90 and PL = 34, plus or minus 2).

The grain size distribution curves are similar except in the fine silt and fine clay ranges. The

dredged fill placed in the subaqueous pit contains 10 percent more fine silt and 10 percent less

fine clay material compared to its pre-dredged composition. Numerous reasons may be

conjectured, including stripping of the fine clay fraction during the dredging and dumping

operations, silting sediment from the channel into the pit, erosion processes, or normal sampling

variations.