Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: When should monitoring be conducted?
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

ERDC TN-DOER-E17
September 2004
protocol will be peer-reviewed by monitoring experts associated with the North American Bird
Conservation Initiative (NABCI) Monitoring Working Group chaired by Dr. Jon Bart (USGS).
When should monitoring be conducted?
Early season counts may offer the best population estimate; however, nesting birds are usually
asynchronous, therefore counting only nests may underestimate the population. Timing of sur-
veys will also be impacted locally by flood events and other weather conditions. Perhaps the
standardized method may need to require both an early and mid/late season survey. Current dis-
cussion assumes that monitoring will be conducted annually.
Further discussion established the need to clearly state population-wide objectives for ILT
monitoring efforts (i.e., meet objectives of the Recovery Plan), state local survey objectives (i.e.,
conserve ILT populations in specific Corps projects), and establish a population-wide monitoring
plan and protocol that can be established at the national level.
How should productivity be measured?
Several issues were raised concerning the importance of measuring productivity and how it can
be standardized. The following were major points that need to be investigated:
 Assess the relative merits of frequent visits to a colony (once a week or more frequently)
to estimate productivity using survival analyses versus infrequent visits (as few as two per
season) to provide productivity indices. Habitat quality often varies considerably among years,
and even within a season, because of factors like flood events and plant growth. However, birds
may become stressed if visits occur too frequently.
 Compatibility among data derived via differing procedures should be evaluated relative
to different objectives for analyses of productivity data. Some projects measure the number of
fledglings per breeding pair (FBR); however, few areas are collecting this data and methods are
inconsistent. Timing is very important when counting fledglings, because young will move
around more as the season progresses.
 Measure egg and chick survivorship with some type of survival analysis (e.g.: Mayfield
method).
 The term "fledging" needs a specific definition and should be measured consistently.
Usually, the definition of a fledgling is a young bird that is easily discernable from adults, is
greater than 15 days old, and can sustain flight for relatively long distances.
Detectability of nests and young must be considered when assessing productivity.
 Demographic models should be designed to allow effective use of range-wide productiv-
ity data.
How should habitat be monitored?
 Compose a set of explicit questions regarding habitat and develop hypotheses that
address those questions, then design experiments to test those hypotheses.
 Coordinate experiments among regions (Corps Districts) in order to draw more general
conclusions.
9

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business