Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

ERDC TN-DOER-T2
December 2000
Public prejudice against technologies/processes used to treat and manage sediments.
Lack of consist or total absence of applicable state regulations.
Intermittent, variable sediment characteristics associated with typical dredging projects.
Required development of market and acceptance of products produced from dredged
sediments.
Resistance from labor groups to displacement of traditional products and associated jobs.
Long-term liability and legal responsibilities associated with produced products.
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS: A number of potential methods, activities, and procedural changes
may aid in overcoming or minimizing such barriers:
Long-term forecasting of dredging requirements and funding availability.
Public funding of centralized dredged sediment storage and management facilities.
Use of other waste streams to ensure a continuous feed stream to process.
Processing of other waste streams to augment income.
Partnering between TDFs to increase overall product markets.
Decouple the end product from the treatment process.
Mandate use of recycled dredged sediment products in public projects.
Educate the public about the benefits associated with using recycled dredged sediment
products.
Some of these changes will probably be required to foster and stimulate the implementation of these
innovative decontamination and treatment technologies. Regardless of the type of decontamination
or treatment technology chosen for a navigation project, one thing is for certain: the economic and
environmental benefits will have to be clearly identified and articulated to project sponsors, the
public, and other stakeholders before such a technology is selected for use.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Technical Panel
Co-Chairman, Tom Wakeman, Eastern Commissioner of the U.S. Section of PIANC
Co-Chairman, Dr. Danny Reible, Chevron Professor of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana
State University
Member, Steve Garbaciak, Blasland, Bouck, and Lee, Inc.
Member, Bob Hopman, Foster Wheeler Environmental Corp.
Member, Frank Hamons, American Association of Ports Authorities
Member, Mr. Craig Wardlaw, Headwater Environmental Services Corp., Ontario
14

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business