Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: APPLICATION TO USACE DREDGING PROJECTS
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

ERDC TN-DOER-T7
October 2004
dependent upon chemical addition to flocculate the material. Under unfavorable conditions (in
which the slurry requires high dosages of flocculants) chemical costs can outweigh equipment
costs.
The fact sheets in Appendix A give a range of costs for the processes described, reflecting the
impact of less-than-optimum operating conditions.  When comparing cost estimates from
different vendors, care should be taken to do so on an equivalent-cost basis. If one estimate
includes wastewater treatment and another does not, for example, it may be impossible to extract
these cost differentials and establish a uniform basis for comparison. Requests for proposals
should attempt to address this issue by specifying all cost items that are to be included or
itemized.
APPLICATION TO USACE DREDGING PROJECTS: With decreasing storage capacity
available, managers in many areas of the country are considering efforts to recover and put to
beneficial use previously dredged materials.  Often transport and placement specifications
require that the material be dewatered. While this can be effectively accomplished with passive
dewatering methods, area requirements are large and time to achieve sufficient dewatering for
the materials to be workable may be lengthy. Additionally, construction costs for new CDFs are
high. Dewatering technology has matured in recent years, making material processing more
cost-competitive than in the past. Where existing upland storage is available and adequate,
mechanical dewatering will typically not be the least-cost alternative. Where storage is limited
or must be constructed, or where offsite disposal options are being considered, mechanical
dewatering may offer a reasonable alternative for some projects.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The contributions of the co-authors of this document, and the
companies with which they are affiliated, are gratefully acknowledged: John Waugh, Phoenix
Process Equipment Company, Louisville, KY; Robert L. Schwartz, Solomon Technologies and
Operations Services Corporation (while contributing to this article, now employed by Hazen
Research, Golden, CO); Glen Green and Vic Buhr, J. F. Brennan Company, LaCrosse, WI ; Bob
Braddock, Solomon Technologies and Operations Services Corporation, Lakewood, CO; Heinz-
Dieter Detzner, Department of Port and River Engineering, State Ministry for Economic and
Labour Affairs, Hamburg, Germany.
POINTS OF CONTACT: For additional information contact Ms. Trudy Estes (601-634-2125,
), or the manager of the Dredging Operations and
Environmental Research Program, Dr. Robert M. Engler (601-634-6324, Robert.M.
). This technical note should be cited as follows:
Estes, T. J., Waugh, J., Schwartz, R. L., Green, G., Buhr, V., Braddock, B., and
Detzner, H.-D. (2004).  "Mechanical dewatering of navigation sediments:
Equipment, bench-scale testing, and fact sheets,"  DOER Technical Notes
Collection (ERDC TN DOER-T7), U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.
15

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business