Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Compatibility of Capping and Contaminated Material Placement Options (Cont.)
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

c. Estimates of time required for initial consolidation of the contami-
nated material due to self-weight.
d. Monitoring requirements prior to cap placement.
The process of recolonization by opportunistic species may begin as
soon as contaminated material placement operations are completed
(Rhoads and Boyer 1982; Rhoads and Germano 1982). However, recruit-
ment and colonization processes for many assemblages of coastal benthic
organisms show definite seasonal peaks, usually a primary peak in spring
and a secondary peak in fall. For example, Scott et al. (1987) determined
that recolonization at a Long Island Sound dredged material disposal site
showed peaks during October and December of separate years. Ideally, to
minimize exposure durations of benthic organisms, placement of contami-
nated material and initiation of cap construction should occur prior to the
onset of a seasonal recruitment pulse. During intervals between peaks,
rates of colonization should be sufficiently slow to assume minimal expo-
sure over a period of 3 to 4 weeks. Once cap construction has begun,
those early colonizers of the contaminated deposit will be buried and thus
physically isolated. Assuming that cap placement proceeded at a reason-
able rate, it would be unlikely that any bioaccumulation that had occurred
prior to cap placement would result in unacceptable effects.
Some delay between completion of contaminated material placement
and initiation of capping is desirable from an engineering standpoint. Con-
solidation of the contaminated material and a corresponding increase in
density and strength occur due to the weight of the material as it is placed
in the deposit. This process is called self-weight consolidation. The con-
taminated material should be allowed to undergo initial self-weight con-
solidation prior to capping to increase its stability and resistance to
displacement during cap placement. This is especially important for slur-
ried materials placed by pipeline or by hopper dredge. For slurried materi-
als, a large portion of the self-weight consolidation occurs within a few
weeks of placement. Mechanically dredged materials placed by barge re-
lease are initially deposited at essentially the same density at which they
were dredged, and the potential degree of self-weight consolidation is less
than for slurried materials.
Monitoring is required to determine the areal extent of the contaminated
deposit prior to capping. Surveys and other sampling and monitoring
activities may require several weeks to complete. An appropriate delay
between contaminated material placement and capping must balance envi-
ronmental exposure with the engineering requirements of stability and
scheduling constraints for monitoring and dredging required for capping.
If appropriate precautions are taken to schedule the lag time for consolida-
tion during periods of low benthic recruitment, a period of 3 to 4 weeks
between completion of contaminated sediment placement and initiation of
capping should have minimal environmental effect.
41
Chapter 5 Equipment and Placement Techniques

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business