Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Research Needs
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

One participant proposed that regulators reject permit applications and require
submission of additional information or reconsideration of projects when the
potential for adverse effects is very uncertain. Others responded that the applicant
might have limited flexibility for reconsidering the project.
One group member recommended that the USACE recognize the social ecology
surrounding dredged material management project controversies. Specifically,
human value judgments about ecology are the focus of dredged material
management decisions and could prevent objective management of cumulative
risk. For example, a disposal option might be rejected simply because it is located
in close proximity to people, even if it has the least potential to cause adverse
human health and ecological impacts.
Research Needs
Workgroup members were asked to recommend research initiatives to eliminate
large contributors to uncertainty in the risk characterization of dredged material
management alternatives. Their major research request was to report on case
studies that demonstrate how risk assessment and uncertainty analysis could aid
regulatory decision-making, research planning, and risk communication. Other
important recommendations are listed below in no particular order:
a. Expand on existing centralized research databases (e.g., ERED) and create
new centralized databases.
b. Conduct new research to derive tissue effect levels.
c. Monitor environmental effects of dredged material management activities
and compare to predictions of effects (e.g., compare trophic transfer data
to model results).
d. Determine innovative ways to quantify risk at dispersive versus non-
dispersive sites.
e. Gather life-cycle information to aid in the interpretation of BSAF and the
extrapolation of BSAF across taxa.
f.
Improve understanding of basis for extrapolating from laboratory to field
conditions, including extrapolations from lab species to native species,
from individual indicator species to populations.
g. Investigate efforts of others to develop ecosystem models (i.e., models that
illustrate relationships among species).
22
Chapter 4 Risk Characterization Workgroup Summary

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business