Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Tier III Evaluation
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

Tier III Evaluation
Tier III testing assesses the impact of contaminants in the dredged material on
appropriately sensitive organisms to determine whether there is potential for the
dredged material to result in an unacceptable impact. Assessment methods used
in Tier III are water-column and whole-sediment toxicity tests and
bioaccumulation tests.
Water-column toxicity tests
Water-column toxicity tests evaluate the impact of dredged material on the
water column by exposing test organisms to an elutriate dilution series containing
both dissolved and suspended components of the dredged material. Water
column bioassays must be used when there are no applicable WQS for all
contaminants of concern or when there is reason to suspect that contaminants
may exhibit synergistic effects.
In this test, if survival of animals exposed to undiluted elutriate is
significantly less than survival of animals exposed to the dilution water, the
median lethal concentration (LC50) or median concentration causing some
adverse effect (EC50) is calculated. The LC50 is the concentration lethal to
50 percent of the test organisms. The EC50 is the concentration causing some
sublethal effect (e.g., deformity, immobility) in 50 percent of the test organisms.
The LC50 or EC50 is compared to the modeled concentration of dredged material
in waters outside the mixing zone of the disposal site (USEPA/USACE 1998).
The maximum allowed concentration outside the mixing zone is 0.01 of the LC50
or EC50.
The following uncertainties are associated with the use of water-column
bioassays:
a. The guidance notes that the factor of 0.01 is intended for acute mortality
data (e.g., to relate acute to chronic toxicity) and not for more subtle
effects described by an EC50 (e.g., deformities, reduced growth or
reproduction) (USEPA/USACE 1998). This factor has not been
validated, though it is likely to overestimate the potential for effects
during short exposures.
b. Although the test guidance recommends that three species, representing
different phyla (e.g., crustaceans, fish, etc.), be used in the bioassay, it is
not certain if results obtained with test species will represent sensitivity
of species in the field. It is difficult to interpret the results of the bioassay
relative to field conditions.
c. This bioassay does not address trophic transfer of persistent
bioaccumulative compounds of concern from water-column organisms to
predators at higher trophic levels. However, the potential for
bioaccumulation from water and trophic transfer to higher levels is likely
to be insignificant due to short exposure periods in the field.
22
Chapter 4 Uncertainty in Tiered Evaluation of Dredged Material

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business