Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Step 2: Estimating exposure point concentrations (EPC) (Cont.)
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

settling within the field of influence to provide a concentration of COCs in
sediment. This calculation will require information about sediment resuspension,
local currents, and particle settling. The risk assessment should describe the sources
of such information or justify any assumptions made about these parameters. It
should also explicitly acknowledge uncertainty associated with the parameters.
The important question is "how does the risk assessor define field of influence?"
Obviously, the answer to this question lies in the site-specific characteristics of the
management area and the management technology employed. The risk assessor may
have to employ physical transport models ranging from simple dilution calculations
to more complex models which address multiple physical/chemical mechanisms
such as dilution, partitioning, sedimentation, advection, and diffusion. For example:
a. If the management area is in a low-energy, depositional backwater
environment, the field of influence may be conservatively defined as the
extent of the backwater.
b. In an estuarine environment subject to tidal transport, the tidal excursion
lengths may dictate the field of influence.
c. If the management area is in a high-energy dispersive environment, the risk
assessor probably should not assume that the field of influence
concentrations are equal to the concentrations in the management area
because there will be significant physical processes affecting the fate of
These examples obviously do not encompass all possibilities. The risk assessor will
need detailed knowledge of the physical characteristics of the management site and
the surrounding areas to make a reasonable conservative estimate of far field.
Water-column exposures. At most dredged material management sites, water-
column exposures will be less likely as significant sources of risk than sediment
exposures. The likelihood of a water-column exposure depends on the management
technology used. For unconfined options or capped management areas, fairly simple
estimates of diffusion or pore water transport to the overlying water column along
with estimates of advection and dilution can provide estimates of water-column
exposure concentrations. In these examples, this transport is likely to be very small.
However, for those management options such as dredged material islands or
nearshore confined aquatic disposal, which employ dewatering, the estimates of
water-column exposures will require an initial estimate of concentrations of COCs
in effluent, and may require more sophisticated fate and transport modeling (see text
entitled "Modeling exposure point concentrations").
The product of this text is an initial estimate of the concentration of the COCs at
the disposal site and its field of influence. The simplest (and most conservative)
estimate is to assume the concentrations are equal in these areas.
52
Chapter 3 Ecological Exposure Assessment

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business