Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Massachusetts
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

concentrations and for establishing the effects of subchronic and acute exposures.
The format requirements for the risk assessment report are also given.
Massachusetts
Documents:
"Massachusetts contingency plan," 310 CMR 40.000 (MCP
1993).
"Guidance for disposal site risk characterization." Massachusetts
Department Environmental Protection (BWS/ORS-95-141).
Contact:
Mr. Paul Locke, Massachusetts DEP, Office of Research and
Standards, 1 Winter Street, Boston, MA.
The Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) provides a tiered approach which
uses three methods for human-health risk characterization. Each method becomes
more site specific.
1. In a Method 1 risk assessment, benchmark values or standards for
chemicals of concern in soil and groundwater are used as conservative
estimates to assess risk.
2. In a Method 2 assessment, the assessor may derive new method standards
for compounds for which the MCP does not have standards and/or may
modify existing standards based on site-specific fate and transport
information.
3. In a Method 3 risk assessment, site-specific exposure assumptions are
used to characterize potential risks.
In the cases of Methods 1 and 2 assessments, "a condition of no significant risk
of harm to health exists if no Exposure Point Concentration is greater than the
applicable standard." For a Method 3 assessment, however, the cumulative cancer
risks and cumulative noncancer risks are calculated and compared to the
cumulative carcinogenic or noncarcinogenic risk limit, respectively. The basic
steps of a risk characterization are: identify human receptors; identify
environmental receptors; identify site activities and uses; identify exposure points;
identify exposure pathways; identify exposure point concentrations; identify site
groundwater and soil categories.
Ecological risk assessments under the MCP have a two-stage approach. A
Stage I environmental screening eliminates pathways from Stage II consideration
if:
a. Significant risk is readily apparent.
b. Exposure pathway is incomplete.
c. Pathway is incomplete, but the exposure is so minimal that it clearly does
not pose a significant risk.
A21
Appendix A Summary of Federal, State, and Regional Guidance

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business