Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: 7.5 Dispersion Evaluations for Volatile Emissions
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

1. Information is sufficient to reach a decision regarding volatile emissions.
In this case either:
a. Volatile emissions, after consideration of dispersion, are below
applicable OSHA standards. No further emissions evaluation is
necessary.
b. Volatile emissions, after consideration of dispersion, exceed
applicable OSHA standards, and management actions should be
considered. A decision to implement management actions for
emissions, such as capping or treatment, may require more detailed
information prior to design of such actions. If management actions
are selected, no further emissions evaluation is necessary.
2. Information is not sufficient to reach a decision regarding volatile
emissions. Further evaluation in Tier IV, or management actions as an
alternative to further evaluation, should be considered. A decision to
implement management actions for emissions, such as capping or
treatment, may require more detailed information prior to design of such
actions. If management actions are selected, no further emissions
evaluation is necessary.
7.5 Dispersion Evaluations for Volatile Emissions
Actual contaminant concentrations in the air resulting from sediment
contaminant fluxes are site specific and are affected by atmospheric conditions
such as wind speed, mixing, temperature, as well as the location of the receptor.
To evaluate the impact of sediment contaminant fluxes upon site and near-site air
concentrations, a conservative estimate of actual air concentrations should be
applied for both Tier II and Tier III volatile evaluations. An example scenario to
estimate contaminant air concentrations could incorporate maximum fluxes
obtained from modeling or laboratory testing into calculations that assume a
worst-case, well-mixed set volume of air over the CDF. Contaminant
concentrations can then be estimated for a predetermined period of time to give a
conservative estimate of possible contaminant air concentrations.
The contaminant flux predictions obtained from the models and fluxes
obtained from evaluation of sediment properties or laboratory testing can be
converted to an exposure concentration to evaluate the emission. The
contaminant emission is mixed with the overlying column of air, which is stripped
or entrained into prevailing winds and transported offsite. The resulting
contaminant concentration in the air overlying the site is a function of the
contaminant flux, size of the site, and the air exchange rate with prevailing wind.
The air exchange rate is a function of wind speed and site exposure. As such, the
evaluation should be performed at low, medium, and high wind speed.
A screening model for evaluation of dispersion is included in the Tier II
spreadsheet calculations for volatiles. An additional model developed using data
obtained from testing conducted with the laboratory apparatus described in
7-11
Chapter 7
Guidance for Evaluation of Volatile Emissions

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business