Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: L.3.3 Bioaccumulation from field data
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

The power of a comparison can be determined by:
dn
t  1-β =
- t  1-α ,v
(L-32)
s
When variances are not significantly different, s is replaced by (MSE)2 and v
= N - k df. Using MSE = 0.003763 as above, the power to detect a 10 percent
decrease in mean bioaccumulation below the action level is 0.16, and power to
detect a 50 percent decrease is 0.96. Power for 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 percent
decreases are given in the output for SAS program BIOACC (Section L.4.2.2).
Less than detection limit data. Recommendations for analysis of
bioaccumulation data with less than detection limit values were developed to
facilitate comparisons of two or more samples. When a sample of contaminant
bioaccumulation concentrations must be compared with an action level or
standard, accurate estimation of the sample mean and standard deviation is
important. In general, this may require different censored data methods than
does the comparison of samples in the previous section. Most recommendations
for censored data methods in estimation problems have been based on relatively
large sample sizes (n = 10 or more). Gleit (1985) identified certain methods that
perform better than others for estimating the mean and variance of normal
populations based on samples of n = 5. The best methods, depending on mean,
coefficient of variation, and amount of censoring, included substitution of DL,
DL/2, or zero, and an iterative method using expected values of order statistics.
The latter method (which Gleit recommended), along with several others
including regression and some maximum likelihood techniques, are available in
UNCENSOR (Newman and Dixon 1990).
Recommendations for censored data methods for estimating mean and
standard deviation when n is small are provided by Clarke and Brandon (1996).
If zero is substituted for all nondetects and the sample mean is greater than or
equal to the applicable action level, then clearly no statistical testing is required
as the mean contaminant concentration cannot be less than the action level.
L.3.3 Bioaccumulation from field data
A field bioaccumulation test may be designed to show differences, if any,
between organisms living at the proposed disposal site and the same species
living in the reference area. Ttissue concentrations in organisms collected from
replicate samples at the disposal site(s) are compared with tissue concentrations
in organisms collected from replicate samples at the reference area, using the
decision tree steps in Figures L-4A and 4B. If comparisons involve organisms
from only one disposal site, then the appropriate statistical comparison
procedures, depending on the results of the tests of assumptions, are the two-
sample t-test for equal or unequal variances, or the t-test for unequal variances
using rankits or ranks (Section L.2.1.1.1).
L39
Appendix L Selected Resource Documents

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business