Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Estimating data
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

ERDC TN-DOER-C15
July 2000
indicator map would likely be most useful for visualizing material in a CDF falling within a
certain specification. However, a three-dimensional representation of the material in a CDF
is needed. Different elevations within the CDF could be mapped separately, and vertical
sections mapped in the same manner as the areal sections.
Another useful grouping tool is moving window statistics (Isaaks and Srivastava 1989). A
uniform grid of data points is divided into subareas, and the mean and standard deviation of
the parameters within each subarea are calculated and remapped at the center of the subarea.
This results in a location map in which the parameter value trends and variability are easily
seen. Overlapping the subareas can address the need for a sufficient number of data points
within each subarea to provide reliable statistics (mean and standard deviation) while keeping
areas small enough to capture local detail. Overlapping is particularly useful for small or
irregular data sets (Isaaks and Srivastava 1989). Contour maps may also provide a useful
visual description of material distribution, although their quantitative value may be limited
where extensive interpolation is required. Plots of standard deviation versus sample means,
h-scatter plots, correlation functions, covariance functions, and variograms are other available
interpretive tools (Isaaks and Srivastava 1989) that might be considered if the basic summary
statistics do not reveal a meaningful trend.
Estimating data. Estimating parameters for unsampled locations based on a limited data set is
central to environmental characterization problems. A number of methods have been developed
under the umbrella of geostatistics that have potential application. All are subject to the same
inaccuracies as a result of site variability. Local estimates based on data that are highly variable are
not likely to be very accurate, and should be interpreted in light of the confidence associated with
the data set and the degree of spatial continuity evidenced by the data set.
The first step in estimating is to define the problem. The following three features of estimating a
problem are adapted from Isaaks and Srivastava (1989):
Is a global or local estimate desired?
Is an estimate of the mean or the complete distribution of data values desired?
Are point estimates or block values desired?
To characterize the deposits within a CDF, some point estimates will most likely be needed to
identify extreme values (particularly with respect to contaminant levels), mean block values for
particle size, and some estimate of the variability of the data to estimate recoverable volumes of
material.
All of the methods discussed in Isaaks and Srivastava (1989) involve weighted linear combinations
of the known data points:
n
estimate = v =  wi vi
$
(2)
i =1
9

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business