Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Operational Controls
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

ERDC TN-DOER-C18
August 2000
Containment refers to the ability of the site with associated design features to hold the contaminants
within the site as opposed to treatment approaches intended to destroy or degrade contaminants or
chemically (not physically) immobilize the contaminants within the sediment. Control measures
may include operational modification, selective placement of dredged material, engineered site
controls or containment features, and other site management actions (USACE/USEPA 1992).
Operational Controls. Site operations can be used as a control measure for CDFs to reduce the
loss of contaminants through the surface water, volatilization, and leachate pathways. Operational
controls may include management of ponded water on the site during and after disposal operations.
Mobilization of some contaminants from dredged material depends on a variety of factors, including
the oxidation state of the chemical species. Most metals are much less mobile when maintained in
an anaerobic and reduced condition. On the other hand, oxidizing conditions tend to favor aerobic
biodegradation of organic contaminants. Moist, exposed sediments generally present the greatest
potential for volatilization of organic contaminants. Ponded conditions that normally exist in
nearshore and in-water CDFs can limit volatilization. Water depth also may affect plant and animal
uptake. Maintaining ponded water on the site produces a hydraulic gradient that increases the
potential for movement of leachate through the site. Plant and animal propagation affects contami-
nant uptake. Management of the site for contaminant controls both during filling and after dredged
material placement requires a comprehensive understanding of the migration pathways and the
effects various operations have on the overall mass balance and rate of contaminant releases
(USACE/USEPA 1992). Oftentimes, trade-offs are required to balance effectiveness and cost and
to reduce environmental risk to acceptable levels. Operational techniques for CDFs that have been
used for contaminant control include:
Placement sequencing or sandwiching: filling the CDF with alternating layers of clean and
contaminated material to provide for attenuation (sorption, ion exchange, filtration, biode-
gradation, etc.) or containment of contaminants.
Self-sealing/self-lining: taking advantage of the fine-grained nature of dredged material,
which yields low permeability when subjected to consolidation in a CDF.
De facto covers: placing dredged material with suitable chemical and physical properties as
the final layer in a CDF.
Drainage layers: placement of sand layers to enhance dewatering and consolidation.
Control of ponded water to reduce hydrostatic head or maintain a negative hydraulic gradient
(conditions causing seepage flow into the CDF as opposed to flow from the CDF).
Selective Placement Configurations and Sequencing. Selective placement is the place-
ment of contaminated sediments within the CDF where contaminants remain relatively immobile
or the placement of clean dredged material to intercept or attenuate contaminant migration from
contaminated dredged material. Selective placement configurations with respect to water levels are
possible for nearshore and in-water CDFs. Selective placement below the groundwater or surface
water elevation keeps that portion of the CDF fill anaerobic, which reduces the potential for release
of some classes of contaminants of concern (especially metals) to the dissolved phase. Selective
placement can also take the form of configuring the CDF fill with a greater depth and smaller surface
area. This technique reduces the "footprint" of the site subject to erosion, plant and animal uptake,
2

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business