Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Table 1. Example of Dredged Material and Blend Metal Concentrations, mg/kg
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

Technical Note DOER-C6
May 1999
Cooperating Company
Aspect of Manufactured Soil
Reconditioned biosolids from cow manure
BION Technologies, Inc.*
Formulation and blending equipment
Recycled Soil Manufacturing
Technology (formerly Terraforms)
Reconditioned biosolids from sewage sludge
N-Viro International
Bagged soil products
Scott and Sons Company*
Several bench-scale screening tests have been conducted using uncontaminated dredged material
from Toledo Harbor, Ohio, North Blakeley CDF in Mobile, Alabama, and St. Lucie Estuary,
Florida; nutrient-depleted soils from Fort Drum; New York; sandy soil from the Herbert Hoover
Dike surrounding Lake Okeechobee, Florida, and contaminated dredged material from the New
York/New Jersey Harbor-Newtown Creek site (Lee et al. 1998; Lee and Sturgis 1996). These
screening tests have been successful in determining the optimal percentages of dredged material,
cellulose, and biosolids to manufacture a fertile soil product. Manufactured soil using uncontami-
nated dredged material can potentially be used without restrictions as topsoil, while artificial soil
manufactured from contaminated dredged material may have restricted use (e.g., potential cover
for landfills, superfund sites, and reclamation of mineland) depending on the level of contamination
and the potential for contaminant release. The fertile soil product manufactured from dredged
material has been shown to contain lower levels of contaminants than the original dredged material
because of the dilution of material in the blend. Table 1 shows an example of a manufactured soil
blend that contains total metal concentrations below specified acceptable limits of the USEPA 503
regulations for biosolids-amended agricultural soils. Adding organic waste material to the manu-
factured soil product appears to bind and immobilize the contaminants reducing their bioavailabil-
ity. The quality of manufactured soil with respect to contaminant content will determine the final
use of the manufactured soil product.
Table 1
Example of Dredged Material and Blend Metal Concentrations, mg/kg
USEPA 503
Analytes
Dredged Material
Blend
Regulation
1,752.0
514.0
2,800.0
Zinc
39.0
37.0
7.9
Cadmium
231.0
300.0
Lead
617.0
1,500.0
393.0
Copper
1,172.0
140.0
377.0
1.3
17.0
Mercury
18.4
6.1
Silver
12.5
41.0
33.5
<0.3
Beryllium
<0.6
95.0
420.0
Nickel
297.0
10.3
2.1
Antimony
3.3
Selenium
3.2
<1.6
Thallium
<2.8
BENCH-SCALE SCREENING TESTS: A specific blend (e.g., x1 percent dredged material, y1
percent cellulose, and z1 percent biosolids) can be prepared by mixing predetermined volume
percentages of cellulose, biosolids, and dredged material. Different blends are made by decreasing
the volume percentage of dredged material and increasing the appropriate volume percentage of
cellulose and biosolids. For the manufactured soil technology to be successful, the recommended
2

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business