Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Transmitting Tags
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

ERDC TN-DOER-E18
February 2005
retrieve the tag to download the stored data. The researcher can attempt recapture, although this
option may require many additional hours of field time and may prove financially infeasible. A
second option would rely on commercial or recreational fishermen to retrieve and return the tag
once the fish has been taken.
The satellite tag is another type of DST tag that does not require recapturing the tagged fish to
access the data. Satellite tags store data until the animal surfaces and then transmit the data to a
remote receiving station. The ARGOS data collection and location system, which has receivers
located on a NOAA orbiting satellite, receives and stores the transmitted data. The system uses
UHF radio frequencies and its Doppler location system depends on a stable transmitter frequency
of 401.640 MHz. For this monitoring technique to be successful, the species studied must
surface with enough regularity to transmit data to the satellite, which is overhead for a limited
number of times daily (up to 15 times at higher latitudes). While this type of tagging operation
has been extensively used to track migratory patterns of sea turtles (Keinath et al. 1989),
applications in fisheries research have been limited to large sharks.
The primary disadvantage of satellite telemetry is that it requires a large initial investment.
Individual satellite tags can range in price from $3,000 to $4,500. This amount per single tag is
approximately 10 to 15 times the amount of a single acoustic or radio transmitter. However,
satellite telemetry may be cost-effective in certain situations. Mech and Barber (2002), Gorman
et al. (1992), and Fancy et al. (1989) compared costs of conventional VHF and satellite telemetry
and found VHF telemetry to be 43 times greater, especially when working with remote species
that are difficult to track or in distant oceans. In addition, costs associated with active tracking
such as personnel salaries and travel/living expenses are avoided. A principal advantage is the
ability to collect several month's to year's worth of data for a single animal. Satellite telemetry
tags allow collection of data that define migratory patterns, vertical movement patterns within
the water column, and water temperature relationships.
Transmitting Tags.  This category can be sub-divided based on whether the signal
transmission is either "pulsed" or "coded." For pulsed tags, a simple pulsed signal, a familiar
"beep-beep-beep" is transmitted at a selected pulse rate. Pulsed systems identify tagged fish
through frequency separation combined with a variety of pulse rates. In theory, large numbers of
fish can be tracked simultaneously by using multiple frequencies combined with different pulse
rates. A limiting factor for pulsed tag usage reported in Thorsteinsson (2002) is that many
researchers have difficultly distinguishing more than five pulse rates on a single frequency.
Coded tags operate by emitting a distinct and unique numerical code that differentiates it from all
other tags.  Coded tags offer a clear advantage over pulsed tags in that many individual fish
(some manufacturers report monitoring as many as 212 on a single frequency) can be tracked
separately on a single frequency. Those data can be automatically recorded by a datalogger and
downloaded to a laptop computer. Radio, acoustic (sonic), and combined radio/sonic tags
comprise this category. Examples of radio (upper four) and sonic (lower three) tags and their
typical size ranges, manufactured by Lotek Wireless Inc., are found in Figure 1.
3

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business