|
|
Framework for Dredged Material Management
May 2004
4.1.1 Site Selection under MPRSA
The intent of the criteria for site selection is to avoid unacceptable, adverse
impacts on biota and other amenities. This requires that sufficient information be
assembled such that reasonable assurance can be given that the criteria will be met. As a
rule, the majority of amenities, such as fishing, shipping, mineral extraction, spawning,
breeding, nursery grounds, and cultural or historical features, may be addressed with
existing information. If so, primary concern is then directed to biological resources in and
adjacent to the proposed disposal site. These concerns are addressed by ensuring that any
geographically limited or especially significant living resources are not present within the
site nor outside the site in such a location as to be adversely impacted by movement of
material off the site if it is a dispersive site (USACE/USEPA 1984). Resources within the
site may suffer physical impacts from the deposition of the dredged material, and sites
should be designated/selected to ensure such impacts are acceptable.
The criteria provide that ocean dumping sites will be designated beyond the edge
of the continental shelf, wherever feasible, and at other sites that have been historically
used unless monitoring data or other information indicate the potential for significant
adverse impacts.
If little is known concerning the resources or the characteristics of the site and its
environs, appropriate investigations and studies must be performed. The USACE has
prepared an ocean-site designation manual (Pequegnat, Gallaway, and Wright 1990),
which provides useful guidance and procedures for conducting the appropriate
investigations and studies. In addition, overview manuals for site designation have been
developed (USACE/USEPA 1984; USEPA 1986). Procedures for application of risk
assessment to the aquatic environment can be found in Cura et al. (2001).
4.1.2 Site Specification under CWA
The specification of disposal sites under the CWA is addressed specifically in the
Section 404 (b)(1) Guidelines. The Guidelines establish a sequential review of a proposed
project, the first step of which is avoidance of adverse impacts to the aquatic environment
through an evaluation of practicable alternatives which would have less impact on that
environment [40 CFR 230.10 (a)]. In general, the same concerns as given above for
ocean-site designation are applied to site specification under CWA. These include
potential impacts on physical and chemical characteristics of the aquatic ecosystem,
potential impacts on biological characteristics of the aquatic ecosystem, potential effects
on special aquatic sites, and potential effects on human-use characteristics (40 CFR 230
Subpart C-F).
The specification of an appropriate site under CWA takes into account that CWA
disposal sites may be located in estuaries, rivers, and lakes that may have limited
assimilative capacity. Geographic and operational constraints as well as site capacity may
severely constrain potentially available sites.
28
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing |