Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Surface Runoff
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

Framework for Dredged Material Management
May 2004
Section 404 of the CWA and is also subject to water quality certification under Section
401 State/Tribal water quality standards.
Prediction of effluent quality may be made using partitioning analysis (Estes,
Schroeder, and Bailey in preparation), or the effluent elutriate test procedure (Palermo
1985; Palermo and Thackston 1988, USEPA/USACE 1998, USACE 2003). Partitioning
analysis provides an estimate of effluent concentrations that will result for measured
sediment and carrier water concentrations. This can be helpful in narrowing the
constituents of concern to those that appear to be present at concentrations that may be
environmentally problematic. The modified elutriate test simulates the geochemical and
physical processes occurring during confined disposal. This test provides additional
information on dissolved and particulate contaminant concentrations. The column settling
test (USACE 1987) and expert system SETTLE (Hayes and Schroeder 1992) used for
CDF design provide an estimate of the effluent solids concentrations. Results of both
elutriate and settling tests can be used to predict a total concentration of contaminants in
the effluent. The predicted effluent quality, with allowance for any mixing zone, can be
compared directly with water quality standards. Computerized programs are also
available to compare predicted effluent concentrations with water quality criteria
(Palermo and Schroeder 1991).
Where water quality standards are unavailable or are predicted to be exceeded,
risk assessment may be necessary to further evaluate the environmental impacts
associated with the effluent discharge. Guidance regarding effluent toxicity bioassays
and ecological and human health risk assessment in aquatic environments can be found in
Brandon, Schroeder, and Lee (1997a) and Cura et al. (2001), respectively. The modified
elutriate test can be used to develop the water medium for bioassays if a biological
approach to evaluation of effluent quality is needed. These bioassays are conducted in a
manner similar to those for open-water disposal. The quality of a reference water (usually
the receiving water) should be considered in test interpretation.
If impacts of effluent contaminant concentrations are unacceptable, appropriate
controls should be considered. Control measures available for effluent discharge include
improved settling design or reduced flow to the containment area, chemical clarification
or filtration to remove particulate contaminants, and removal of dissolved contaminants
by more sophisticated treatment processes.
5.3.5 Surface Runoff
Immediately after material placement in a CDF and after ponding water is
decanted, the settled material may experience surface runoff. Rainfall during this initial
period will likely be erosive, and runoff will contain elevated solids concentrations.
Geochemically speaking, the contaminant release is controlled by anaerobic conditions.
Once the surface is allowed to dry, the runoff will contain a lesser concentration of solids,
but the release is now controlled by aerobic conditions, and release of some dissolved
contaminants may be elevated. Runoff water quality requirements may be a condition of
the water quality certification or considered as part of the NEPA process.
42

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business