|
|
Table 8 (Concluded)
Project
Contaminated Material
Capping Material
Site Name and Volume
Volume
Location
Dredging
Placement
Cap Thickness
Placement
Positioning
Literature
Characteristics yd3 103
yd3 103
(Date)
Material
Method
ft
Method
Method
Source
CLIS (1981)
Norwalk,
92 (multiple
Clamshell
Scows
370 (silt and
6-7
Scow
Buoy
Morton, Parker,
generally flat
mounds 8-12 ft
sand)
and Richmond
bottom 65 ft
thick)
1984; O'Connor
deep
and O'Connor
1983
40
Clamshell
Scows
1,300 (silt)
Multiple broad
Scow
Buoy
Morton, Parker,
CLIS
Mill-Quinnipiac
area placement
and Richmond
(1982-1983)
flat bottom 65 ft
1984; O'Connor
estimated final
deep
and O'Connor
avg 6-10
1983
CLIS (1983)
Cap Site No. 1
33 (mounded 3
Clamshell
Scows
78 (silt)
Incomplete
Scows
Buoy
Morton, Parker,
generally flat
ft thick)
coverage
and Richmond
60 ft depth
1984; O'Connor
and O'Connor
1983
CLIS (1983)
Cap Site No. 2
40 (low mound
Clamshell
Scows
40 (sand)
Irregular
Scows
Buoy,
Morton, Parker,
generally flat
2 ft thick)
maximum 4.5
LORAN-C
and Richmond
56 ft deep
1984; O'Connor
and O'Connor
1983
Scows
Buoy
SAIC 1995b
CLIS
S-90-1 Harbor
37.6
102.7
Incomplete
(1989-1990)
Village/Branford
coverage;
River generally
several distinct
flat 60 ft deep
capped
mounds 0.6 to
2.0 ft thick
561.5
Clamshell
665.2
Scows
Taut-wire buoy
NED files
CLIS
CLIS-NHAV 93
(1993-1994)
New Haven
Harbor
generally flat
60 ft deep
0.3 to 2.6 ft
SAIC 1990
New London
Generally flat
17.4 (2.3 ft
Scows
77.8-scow
thick
Disposal Site
54 ft deep
thick)
28.3--hydro
surveys
(1988-1989)
17.4
70.3
SAIC 1996
Portland
Disposal Site
(1991-1992)
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing |