Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Estimation of Long-Term Losses
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

accumulation in the cap. The quantity of contaminant that can be rapidly
adsorbed by the cap material,  cap (milligrams/kilogram dry cap material), is
generally assumed to be proportional to the concentration in the pore water (Cpw,
milligrams/liter),
obs
Kd,cap Cpw
(B11)
cap
where the constant of proportionality is the observed sediment-water partition
coefficient in the cap. Note that the observed partition coefficient is measured
during sorption onto clean cap material since this is the conditions that occur
after placement of a clean cap onto contaminated sediment. The maximum
quantity that can be sorbed by the cap is given by the product of the observed
partition coefficient and the initial pore water concentration of the contaminant
in the underlying sediment, C0.
As a result of sorption onto the immobile sediment, the distance that the con-
taminant migrates in the cap during consolidation of the underlying sediment by
a distance Lsed is given by
Lsed
Lsed
Lsed, A
(B12)
obs
Rf
Kd,cap
b
This distance must be subtracted from the actual cap thickness to estimate effec-
tive cap thickness. Note that this model suggests that the more sorbing a cap, the
less important is consolidation in the underlying sediment. Sorption for hydro-
phobic organics such as polyaromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphe-
nyls is strongly correlated with the organic carbon content of the sediments.
obs
Kd,cap is typically of the order of hundreds or thousands for these compounds; if
a cap contains 0.5-percent organic carbon or more, the loss of effective cap
thickness due to penetration of the contaminant is a small fraction of the sedi-
ment consolidation distance. Metals also tend to be strongly associated with the
solid fraction, again reducing the migration of contaminant out of the sediment
as a result of consolidation.
Estimation of Long-Term Losses
Mechanisms and driving force
The effective cap thickness defined by Equation B9 is subject to advection or
diffusion or a combination of both throughout the lifetime of the cap. The long-
term contaminant release or loss requires estimation of the contaminant flux by
these processes. Diffusion is always present, while advection only occurs if
there exists a significant hydraulic gradient in the underlying sediments. The
relative magnitude of diffusion to advection in the cap of effective thickness, Leff,
can be estimated by the Peclet number.
B6
Appendix B Model for Chemical Containment by a Cap

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business