Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Comparison of Uncapped and Analytical and Numerical Capped Model Predictions
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

analytical model in the form of a Mathcad spreadsheet and the numerical model
are available from the author
Danny Reible, Director
Hazardous Substance Research Center/S&SW
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Ph: 504/388-3070, Fax: 504/388-1476, e-mail: reible@che.lsu.edu
The model predictions for flux are shown in Figure B2.
Comparison of Uncapped and Analytical and
Numerical Capped Model Predictions
The first case is for a contaminated system with no cap. The result is pre-
sented as the solid line in Figure B2. The flux starts out at a high value (effec-
tively infinite at time of first exposure of the contaminated sediment) and decreases
with time.
Figure B2. Example calculations of contaminant flux through cap
B23
Appendix B Model for Chemical Containment by a Cap

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business