Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Dredging: Contaminated Sediments
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Research Report Summary, December 1998
Dredging Operations and Environmental Research Program
Dredging:
Contaminated Sediments
Improving Dredged Material Management Decisions with Uncertainty
Analysis (TR DOER-3)
ISSUE: Federal laws and regulations require
q Making preliminary recommendations for
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
further refinement of the ranking.
and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
SUMMARY: The most significant sources of
(USEPA) to assess the potential for dredged
uncertainty within the tiered evaluation process
material management activities to have signifi-
included identification of the contaminants of
cant undesirable effects on human health or the
concern, the selection and use of reference sedi-
environment. The USACE and USEPA have
ments, trophic transfer of sediment-associated
developed an evaluation process for making
contaminants, the potential for chronic toxicity
dredged material management decisions to pro-
and the use of chronic sublethal bioassays, defi-
tect against such effects. Uncertainty regarding
nition of assessment and measurement end
the ecological and human health risks associated
points during the conduct of an environmental
with dredged material disposal alternatives can
risk assessment, the use of contaminant fate and
lead to delayed, costly, and unwise decisions.
transport models, tissue-based measures of tox-
Uncertainty about the likelihood for unaccept-
icity, dose-response models for human recep-
able impacts can result from the lack of knowl-
tors, and the toxicity of complex mixtures.
edge about critical elements or processes
Specific recommendations for the need for more
contributing to risk or natural variability in the
extensive field validation for many of the com-
same elements or processes.
ponents in the tiered evaluation process were
RESEARCH: The objective was to discuss the
made.
importance of uncertainty in environmental de-
AVAILABILITY OF REPORT: The report is
cision making through specific reference to the
available in .pdf format on the World Wide Web
dredging program.  The approach taken in-
at http://www.wes.army.mil/el/dots and through
cluded the following steps:
Interlibrary Loan Service from the U.S. Army
q Describing in detail the uncertainty sources
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station
within the tiered evaluation process.
(WES) Library, telephone (601) 634-2355. To
purchase a copy of the report, call NTIS at (703)
q Ranking sources of uncertainty within the
487-4780.
tiered evaluation process by degree of
contribution.
About the Authors: Dr. Todd S. Bridges performs research at WES; contract support was
provided by Drs. Donna J. Vorhees and Susan B. Kane Driscoll and Ms. Katherine von Stackel-
berg, Menzie-Cura and Associates, Inc., Chelmsford, MA. Point of Contact: Dr. Todd S.
Bridges, Principal Investigator, telephone (601) 634-3626, or e-mail
bridget@mail.wes.army.mil.
Please reproduce this page locally, as needed.

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business