|
|
resuspended sediments in energetic environments). In shallow waters, there may be
exposure via plant uptake and subsequent herbivores. In the figure, the terms
"primary receptor" and "secondary receptor" represent general trophic levels, not a
prioritization of importance. Note that this conceptual model depicts a shallow site
where forage fish and zooplankton are important receptors and are important
biological media for exposure to higher trophic levels (groundfish and pelagic fish).
Contaminant exposure pathways that do not lead to a species or group of species
or humans which may be potential receptors are incomplete and therefore the risk
assessor may assume that there is no potential for risk associated with a particular
contaminant along that pathway (Figure 3).
The product of Steps 6 and 7 is a graphical and narrative description of the
complete exposure routes specific for the COCs, habitats, types of species, and
likely human receptors. It should include a written summary of the chemical,
physical, and biological conditions at the proposed disposal site. Where data are
insufficient to conduct any of the preceding steps, the description should recommend
means (e.g., field surveys) to provide the information necessary to complete the
conceptual model. In those cases where further field or laboratory work is
recommended, the description should also stipulate the required data goals and
methodology. Subsequent steps in the ecological risk assessment, particularly the
development of a list of receptors, will depend on the site characterization inherent
in the development of the conceptual model.
34
Chapter 2 Problem Formulation
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing |