Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Step 3: Food chain modeling (Cont.)
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

The choice of which expression of exposure to use depends on the toxicity data
available for a particular receptor.
For example, if the effects level for a given receptor is expressed as a dietary
concentration (the concentration of a contaminant in the food of a receptor), then a
dietary concentration associated with exposure at the disposal site should be
calculated.
The calculation of doses, body burdens, and dietary concentrations proceeds in a
similar manner to the prediction of exposure point concentrations. That is, the
assessment may make an initial estimate based on relatively simple and reasonably
conservative assumptions. The risk assessment must use a more sophisticated food
chain model if the initial estimates:
a. Result in potential risk.
b. Ignore an essential exposure route defined in the conceptual model.
c. Exceed some known biological or physical limitation governing body
burdens.
This is not to suggest continuous iterations. Rather, the risk assessor must
ultimately choose a model which most realistically reflects site conditions and uses
as much site specific information as possible.
Initial estimates of concentrations in infauna or fish
This text provides a simple calculation to estimate the concentrations of some
COC in infauna and fish which may inhabit the management area and the local field
of influence.
There are five classes of contaminants for which concentrations in infauna and
fish may be important in the exposure assessment. These include: metals (generally
only mercury biomagnifies), chlorinated organics (i.e., pesticides, PCBs,
dioxin/furans), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH). At dredged material
management sites which have progressed to Tier III and Tier IV evaluations, the 28-
day bioaccumulation results modified according to Clarke and McFarland (1991) to
account for steady state provide estimates of invertebrate tissue concentrations. The
risk assessment may use these tissue concentrations as input to food chain models to
develop body burdens in higher trophic levels such as fish or piscivorous birds.
If a measured estimate of tissue concentration is not available for a COC, one
can estimate concentrations of bioaccumulative compounds in biota (invertebrates
or fish) based on a biota-sediment accumulation factor (BSAF) which expresses the
accumulation of contaminants from sediments to the biota. The BSAF depends upon
the concentration of the contaminant in the biota, Ca, the fraction lipid of the biota
(Fl), the concentration in sediments (Cs) and the fraction organic carbon of the
sediments (Foc). The relationship is:
55
Chapter 3 Ecological Exposure Assessment

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business