Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) framework for ecological risk assessment (Cont.)
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

the decision-making, such as the Port of New York and New Jersey
(NY/NJ) Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) project.
The authors place an emphasis on the importance of discussion between
risk assessor and risk managers, not only in the planning stages, but
throughout the risk assessment process. Consultation between the risk
manager and risk assessor is especially important at the beginning and
end of the assessment and when the analysis plan is being developed.
b. Problem formulation phase. The first phase of an ecological risk
assessment, as described in this document, is "Problem Formulation."
This phase involves "generating and evaluating preliminary hypotheses
about why ecological effects have occurred, or may occur, from human
activities." The problem formulation serves as the basis for the rest of the
risk assessment. There are basically three products from executing this
step:
(1) Assessment end point(s).
(2) A conceptual model.
(3) An analysis plan.
Assessment end points are "explicit expressions of the actual
environmental value that is to be protected" (USEPA 1992a). These end
points should accurately reflect the ecological concern at the site and
focus the risk assessment.
Once these end points are established, a conceptual model of the
relationship between stressor(s) and the assessment end points can be
developed. The two parts of a conceptual model are a written explanation
of the predicted relationships between the stressor and assessment
endpoint (risk hypotheses) and a diagram representing the relationships
described in the written portion. Justification for the risk hypotheses, as
well as uncertainty associated with the proposed conceptual model should
be mentioned. An example of a source of uncertainty is if multiple
stressors are present at a site. Complex interactions may occur between
these stressors which the risk assessor might not predict in a risk
hypothesis.
The analysis plan in the "Problem formulation" phase should include the
types of data that will be used, the method for data treatment, the
assessment design, and level of confidence needed to make management
decisions based on available data. Different measures to evaluate risk
hypotheses should also be developed, such as measures of effect,
measures of exposure, and measures of ecosystem and receptor
characteristics. Justifications and uncertainties associated with the
analysis plan should also be included.
c. Analysis phase. The purpose of the "Analysis phase" of an ecological risk
assessment is to evaluate the data that have been collected. The
A4
Appendix A Summary of Federal, State, and Regional Guidance

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business