Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Dredging: Innovative Technology
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

Corps of Engineers Research Report Summary, October 2002
Dredging Operations and Environmental Research Program
Dredging:
Innovative Technology
Soil Separation Mobile Treatment Plant Demonstration, Bayport Confined Disposal
Facility, Green Bay, Wisconsin (ERDC/EL TR-02-38)
ISSUE:  Confined disposal facilities (CDFs)
density separator was used to separate sand from
the bulk sediment. The target sand product
have historically been used for disposal of both
specifications were less than 10 percent fines by
clean and contaminated dredged material from
mass and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
navigational dredging projects. Many CDFs are
concentrations less than 1 mg/kg. The underflow
nearing capacity. Removal of uncomtaminated
fraction averaged over 92 percent sand, as
materials from the CDFs is a viable option for
measured by a Coulter Counter. PCBs were
extending the life of these facilities. This approach
reduced  to  0.144  mg/kg  PCB  1242  and
carries the additional benefit of producing a
0.0119 mg/kg PCB 1260 in the sand, from
marketable product for beneficial uses, which can
2.71 mg/kg and 0.145 mg/kg in the feed material,
potentially help to offset the cost of processing.
respectively. Based on statistical analysis of the
RESEARCH:  The  feasibility  of  physical
results, the contaminant concentrations predicted
separation as a volume reduction method has been
for the sand fraction by the bench-scale testing
demonstrated at several disposal facilities. A
were essentially equivalent to that achieved in the
guidance document addressing principles of
field operation. Distribution of metals was
physical separation as they apply to soils and
somewhat more variable than for PCBs, but
sediments, and identifying standard equipment,
metals were reduced by a factor of 2.6 to an order
selection criteria, and potential sources was
of magnitude in the sand fraction.
recently completed. Technical notes addressing
AVAILABILITY OF REPORT:  The report is
recovery of materials from CDFs were also
available in .pdf format on the World Wide Web
published under the Dredging Operations and
Environmental Research (DOER) program. Work
through Interlibrary Loan Service from the U.S.
is ongoing at the U.S. Army Engineer Research
Army Engineer Research and Development
and Development Center, funded under the DOER
Center (ERDC) Research Library, telephone (601)
program, to develop bench-scale methods for
634-2355,  or  the  following  Web  site:
economical preliminary feasibility evaluations.
SUMMARY:  Preprocessing  and  separation
equipment were tested in a one-day demonstration
at Green Bay, WI. A 24-in. (0.6-m) maximum
About the Authors: Study Investigators were Mmes. Trudy J. Olin-Estes, Research Civil Engineer, and
Susan E. Bailey, Environmental Engineer, Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center; Mr. David W. Bowman, Physical Scientist, U.S. Army Engineer District, Detroit; and
Dr. Dennis L. Brandon, Statistician, Environmental Laboratory.
Point of Contact: Dr. Robert M. Engler, Program Manager of the Dredging Operations and Environmental
Research Program, (601) 634-3624, .
Please reproduce this page locally, as needed.

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business