|
|
conditions expected as a result of the proposed project. The UTM
processes of scoping the technical evaluation and identification of
relevant COC migration pathway(s) discussed in Section 3.1 is generally
analogous to this step of the risk assessment process.
Effects assessment determines the dose-response that might cause an
effect, such as exceedence of a water quality standard or an effect
resulting from bioaccumulation. Effects assessment characterizes the
dredged material and is independent of the CDF. The evaluations
conducted in Tiers I through III concerning releases or impacts of the
contaminant migration pathways in Chapters 4 through 9 are generally
analogous to this step of the risk assessment process.
Exposure assessment determines the conditions of exposure to COC that
populations, communities, or ecosystems would experience in the field as
a result of the proposed project. Exposure assessment characterizes
conditions in the field related to the project and is independent of the
effects assessment. The mixing, dispersion, or attenuation of effluent,
runoff, leachate and volatiles, and the exposure conditions to entire
dredged material in Tiers I through III of the contaminant migration
pathways in Chapters 4 through 9 are one aspect of exposure assessment.
The exposure evaluation should also consider exposure times in relation
to the times implicit in the measurements of effects. Exposure evaluation
should consider the spatial scale of the release in relation to the scale of
the receiving water body and the distribution of the ROC at the
population level and in relation to potential ecosystem effects. The
considerations discussed in Section 2.2.4 are an important part of
exposure evaluation.
Risk characterization basically involves comparison of the results of the
effects assessment and exposure assessment to determine whether there is
a risk. If conditions necessary to cause an effect (effects assessment) are
greater than the exposure expected in the field (exposure assessment),
there is no risk. However, if exposure conditions are greater than those
that will cause effects, a potential risk exists. The evaluation and decision
processes in Tiers I through III of the pathways in Chapters 4 through 9
are generally analogous to this step of the risk assessment process.
2-8
Chapter 2 Structure and Approach of the UTM
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing |