|
|
2.2.2 Contaminants of Concern
COC are the constituents or contaminants present in the dredged material
being evaluated that may have a potential to affect ROC. General COC concepts
are presented here, and COC are discussed in relation to Tier I evaluations in
Section 3.4 and in detail specific to each pathway in Chapters 4 through 9.
The COC are likely to be different for each dredged material and for a
particular dredged material, are likely to be different for different pathways. COC
to be evaluated are identified on a case-specific basis in the Tier I evaluation for
each pathway. If little information is available, the evaluation may enter Tier I
with a "standard laundry list" of potential COC. However, through the Tier I
process the "standard laundry list" should be replaced by a set of potential COC
specific to the dredged material and pathway being investigated. It is important
that all constituents relevant to the disposal activity being evaluated are included
as potential COC. Constituents that Tier I shows may be important to a particular
investigation should be added, and constituents that Tier I provides no reason to
believe may be relevant to a particular investigation should be deleted from the
potential COC. While there may be some constituents that are truly of concern
and are legitimately among the COC for most investigations, detailed
investigation of constituents not relevant to the disposal activity being evaluated
are of no benefit and should be avoided.
2.2.3 Receptors of Concern
ROC are the resources that may have a potential to be affected by COC. ROC
include abiotic resources such as water quality, groundwater quality, and air
quality as well as the more commonly thought of biotic resources such as
particular plant or animal species. ROC may be different for each CDF, and for a
given CDF, are likely to be different for different pathways.
ROC are mentioned here because ROC is a term common to both the UTM
and risk assessment. Because ROC are the resources potentially at risk, the ROC
determine the tests that will be conducted. In some cases, ROC are evaluated
directly, such as when water quality is evaluated by measuring COC
concentrations and comparing these to standards. In other cases, ROC may not be
amenable to direct evaluation. For example, the resource of concern may be a
local population of edible fish. It is often not possible to directly evaluate potential
effects on the population, and it may not even be possible or practical to test
individual fish of the species of interest. Such cases are common and are
addressed with tests of surrogate species from which effects on the population of
interest are inferred. The selection of appropriate test species is discussed in the
sections of Chapters 4 through 9 in evaluations that use biological effects tests.
2.2.4 Basis of Management Action Decisions
The purpose of management actions is to protect ROC outside the CDF. As
noted above, ROC may be abiotic, such as water quality standards, or biotic, such
as particular organisms. The decision that management actions are required to
2-10
Chapter 2 Structure and Approach of the UTM
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing |