Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: 3.4.1 Need for Sediment Chemistry
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

Proper identification of COC is essential to accurate assessment of potential
impacts and the need for management actions. If an important constituent is not
included, the assessment could overlook potential effects. If an increasing number
of unimportant constituents are included, evaluations tend to lose focus, become
inefficient, and perhaps incorrectly identify potential effects where none actually
exist. While it is usually better to err on the side of inclusion, each potential COC
should be carefully considered, and constituents should not be included without
objective justification for doing so.
3.4.1 Need for Sediment Chemistry
If the available evidence indicates COC may be present, final selection of
COC may require supplementing available information with chemical analyses of
the sediment. Also, the Tier II evaluations for each pathway, if they are necessary,
rely on bulk sediment data for the proposed dredged material. If adequate bulk
sediment data are not available, samples should be collected and the bulk
sediment chemistry should be determined. It is possible to skip Tier II and go
directly to tests in higher tiers. However, this may not be an efficient use of
resources in most cases, since subsequent testing may be unnecessary. In addition,
proper interpretation of some pathway tests requires sediment chemistry data.
In some instances, it may be sufficient to perform confirmatory analyses for
specific COC. In other cases where the initial evaluation indicates that a variety
of COC may be present, chemical analysis of the dredged material could provide a
useful inventory, and bulk sediment chemistry analysis may be appropriate.
Should it be necessary to collect and analyze sediment samples at this point, it
should be assumed that Tier II and Tier III testing may be needed for all pathways.
Hence, consideration should be given to collecting sufficient material from the
dredging, reference, and control sites to conduct these tests. Careful attention
should be given to storage conditions and storage times for sediments prior to
performing evaluations. If this is not done, it may be necessary to repeat the
sampling.
3.4.2 Characteristics of Contaminants of Concern
Contaminants for which there are applicable standards should be identified as
a COC. COC include potentially toxic or bioaccumulative constituents and those
that may promote undesirable organisms or growth. Salt is always a potential
COC whenever dredged material from a saline waterway is placed in a CDF
where nonsaline or lower-salinity environments may be affected. Other potential
COC include those that might reasonably be expected to require management
actions if the dredged material in question were to be placed in the CDF. The
potential COC for each proposed action should be identified on the basis of the
following, keeping in mind appropriate analytical considerations:
Presence in the dredged material
Concentration in the dredged material relative to the concentration in the
reference material
3-9
Chapter 3
Initial Evaluations

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business