Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: 3.5 Consideration of Prior Evaluations and Testing
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

These considerations have to be evaluated for all dredged material. Even so, it is
desirable that local guidance be developed, based on technical evaluations, which
describes the emphasis on factors deemed appropriate in each area.
The results of the COC identification should be documented. This should
identify all contaminants considered and briefly summarize the justification for
identifying or not identifying each as a COC for the specific dredged material,
CDF, and pathway being evaluated. These are the COC that will be evaluated in
higher tiers as appropriate.
3.5 Consideration of Prior Evaluations and
Testing
An important aspect of a Tier I evaluation is the consideration of any
previously conducted pathway evaluations for the project, especially those which
included pathway testing. In some cases, COC may be present in the dredged
material, but earlier detailed evaluation of the pathway indicated no management
actions were required. Prior evaluations should be appropriately documented and
used in the developing the Tier I decisions for each pathway.
3.6 Tier I Decisions
After consideration of all available information in Tier I, one of the following
conclusions is reached for each pathway. The conclusions are described here in
generic terms and are described in terms specific to each pathway in the Tier I
discussions of Chapters 4 through 9:
1. Existing information provides a sufficient basis for a decision about the
need for management actions associated with the pathway being
evaluated.
2. Existing information does not provide a sufficient basis for a decision
about the need for management actions associated with the pathway being
evaluated. In this case the evaluation must proceed to higher tiers.
It should be noted that the selection of a management action at this or any
other tier may require reevaluation of the specific pathway, as well as other
pathways as management actions may materially change the nature of the
material, the CDF, or the pathways. Also, even though a decision that
management actions are needed may be made at Tier I, more detailed information
for the pathway may be needed for design of specific actions.
3-12
Chapter 3
Initial Evaluations

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business