Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: 4.1.3 Regulatory Considerations
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

this case, but the influence of the filter media in retaining suspended particles and
adsorption of contaminants from the effluent discharge should be considered.
Dredged material may be placed in some CDFs by direct mechanical means
such as rehandling from barges or by truck. Although such filling operations
normally involve handling relatively little free water, there may still be an effluent
discharge. In addition, there may be ponded water in the CDF before filling
begins, especially for CDFs constructed in water. For the case of mechanical
filling, the effluent discharge involves the free water that is released during the
mechanical disposal operation or the existing pond water that is displaced by the
operation. Separate procedures are available in Tier II for mechanical filling.
However, no specific Tier III laboratory tests have been developed for the case of
direct mechanical disposal. The testing procedures described here for hydraulic
disposal may be used in the interim for the case of mechanical disposal and are
considered conservative for such evaluations.
4.1.3 Regulatory Considerations
As discussed in Chapter 1, CDF effluent is administratively defined as the
discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States and is subject
to regulation under CWA Section 404. The fact that the effluent is nationwide
permitted at 33 CFR 330.5(16) does not relieve applicants from Corps of
Engineers permits, nor does it relieve the Corps when undertaking dredging
projects from ensuring that effluent does not violate applicable water quality
standards. Specifically, the nationwide permit requires that a water quality
certification be obtained from the appropriate agency, whether it be the State,
tribe, or EPA in some cases.
In those instances where the effluent receives CWA Section 401 Water
Quality Certification and there is no reason to believe that there will be
contaminants released from the effluent during the filling operation and
subsequent release of ponded water from CDF management, no further evaluation
of effluent is needed.
4.1.4 Mixing Zones
The evaluation of effluent discharges should consider the effects of mixing
and dispersion (Section 2.3.3). Mixing zones are normally defined by the State
regulatory agency as part of the CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification
requirements. When effluent enters receiving waters, it is dispersed by natural
physical processes so that the concentration decreases spatially and temporally
beyond the point of entry. This phenomenon is important in determining the
potential for effects, because effects depend on both the concentration to which
organisms are exposed and the length of time for which they are exposed. Effects
are generally less at lower exposure concentrations or shorter exposure times, and
for each COC there are exposure time-concentration combinations below which
effects do not occur. The Federal regulations implementing Section 404(b)(1),
Clean Water Act (40 CFR 230), recognize this and explicitly provide for
4-3
Chapter 4
Effluent During Disposal Operations

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business