|
|
The chemical and biological evaluations in Tier II and Tier III will be
sufficient for evaluation of effluent discharges in the vast majority of cases. As
with all pathways, Tier IV evaluations would involve consideration of effluent
within the framework of a risk assessment.
The procedures in the various tiers can be applied to evaluate the performance
of existing CDFs and to design new CDFs. For existing CDFs, the techniques can
be used to predict the effluent quality for a given set of anticipated operational
conditions (known flow and containment area size). In a similar manner, the
required operational conditions for a new CDF (size, geometry, maximum
allowable dredge size, etc.) can be determined to meet a given effluent quality
requirement by comparing the predicted effluent quality for a variety of assumed
operational conditions. In either case, evaluation of effluent quality can only be
considered in conjunction with a sound design of the CDF for retention of
suspended solids and initial storage of the sediments to be dredged.
4.1.8 Sampling Requirements
Note that water from the dredging site is used in the Tier III EET for
evaluation of effluent discharges. Dredging site water is used since the effluent
discharge only involves a small fraction of dredged material solids and the
fractionation of contaminants to the dissolved phase will be influenced primarily
by characteristics of the dredging site water. Note that disposal site receiving
water samples should also be taken and analysed to evaluate mixing.
4.2 Tier I - Initial Evaluation of Effluent
The Tier I evaluation for a proposed project (see Chapter 3) will result in
determination of the need for contaminant evaluations, identification of pathways
of concern, identification of contaminants of concern, and decisions based on
existing information.
It is important to consider prior evaluations of the effluent pathway in Tier I to
determine if additional evaluations are needed. For example, if prior tests or
evaluations are available, and project conditions and dredged material
characteristics are unchanged, new evaluations would not be required.
After consideration of the Tier I effluent quality information, one of the
following conclusions is reached for effluent (Figure 4-2).
1. Information is sufficient to reach a decision without further evaluation.
2. Information is not sufficient to reach a decision regarding effluent quality.
Conduct Tier II and/or Tier III evaluations.
4-7
Chapter 4
Effluent During Disposal Operations
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing |