Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: E.1.4 Evaluation of dissolved contaminant concentrations by comparison with WQS
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

c. Evaluation of concentrations of suspended plus dissolved constituents by
comparison with toxicity test results after allowance for mixing under
Tier III.
E.1.4 Evaluation of dissolved contaminant concentrations by
comparison with WQS
If necessary, the potential for water quality effects may be evaluated by
comparison of predicted contaminant concentrations, as determined by screens
or laboratory tests, with the WQS, considering the effects of mixing. The mixing
evaluation need only be made for the contaminant requiring the greatest dilution
to meet its WQS. The key information derived from the model is the maximum
dissolved concentration of the contaminant at the boundary of the mixing zone.
This concentration is compared to the applicable WQS. See Section 2.3.2, Chap-
ter 2, maintext, for additional discussion of applicable WQS.
E.1.5 Evaluation of concentrations of suspended plus dissolved
constituents by comparison with toxicity test results
The potential water column toxicity of the discharge material may be
determined with toxicity tests evaluated in consideration of mixing. In this case,
the dilution of the discharge expressed as a percent of the initial volume of
disposed fluid in a given volume of water column is calculated. The key
parameters derived from the evaluation are the maximum concentration of the
discharge in the water column at the boundary of the mixing zone. These
concentrations are compared to toxicity endpoints such as LC50 or EC50 as
determined by toxicity tests.
E.1.6 Physical characteristics of dredged material discharges
Discharges of effluent or runoff from CDFs can be introduced to the
receiving waters in a variety of ways including direct pipeline outfalls or open
channels. For purposes of evaluation of initial mixing, barges or hopper dredge
discharges are discrete discharges, while direct discharges of effluent, runoff, or
leachate to surface water should be considered continuous discharges.
E.1.7 Confined disposal facility (CDF) effluent discharge
Dredged material, hydraulically placed in a confined disposal area, settles
into a thickened deposit of material overlaid by a clarified supernatant. The
supernatant waters are discharged from the site as effluent during active dredg-
ing operations. The effluent may contain both dissolved contaminants and
suspended colloidal particles with associated (adsorbed or held by ion exchange)
contaminants. Supernatant waters from confined disposal sites are discharged
after a retention time of up to several days. Furthermore, actual withdrawal of
the supernatant is governed by the hydraulic characteristics of the ponded area
and the discharge weir. The effluent suspended solids concentration is typically
E3
Appendix E Evaluation of Mixing in Surface Waters

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business