restoration">

 

Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Conclusions and Recommendations
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

7
Conclusions
and Recommendations
Conclusions
The flexible-discharge dustpan dredge demonstration project conducted in
the HOP area on the Mississippi River was successful. Because the Beachbuilder
demonstrated safe navigation and dredging operations, the objectives of the
project were met. USACE personnel, contractors, and bar pilots agreed that the
dredging operation was safe with respect to vessel traffic moving up and down
the river. The Beachbuilder dredged approximately 222,000 cu yd of sediment
and placed it in the designated marsh construction site. The majority of project
requirements were met, although the maximum pumping distance was 10,820 ft
with additional pipe available for the job; however, it was not required. Dredged
material was pumped the total distance using the ladder pump and only one of the
two deck pumps (5,400 hp out of a total available plant capacity of 9,000 hp).
Use of the second pump would have allowed the dredge to pump the required
distance of 15,000 ft. The flexible floating hose worked well with no leaks or
breaks.
Beachbuilder demonstrated the capability to cease dredging and move from
one side of the channel to the other in approximately 11 min when required. A
continuous dredging capability was demonstrated when the Beachbuilder was
operating in the RDB half of the channel. Single deep-draft vessel traffic could
safely pass in the LDB half of the channel when the Beachbuilder dropped its
cross-channel anchor wire and picked it back up after the vessel traffic cleared.
Forward movement into the cut was maintained by the push tug. Travel back into
the RDB side of the channel due to vessel traffic was conducted if dredging
operations were ongoing in the LDB half of the channel, two vessels passed each
other in the channel abreast of the dredging area, or if the river pilot in command
of the vessel requested additional clearance.
The average production rate for the entire 192-hr-long demonstration was
1,200 cu yd/hr or 27,800 cu yd/day to dredge 222,000 cu yd. The average
production rate of the dredge while advancing was 2,300 cu yd/hr, with a maxi-
mum rate achieved of 4,600 cu yd/hr. The dredge achieved an average speed of
74 ft/min to back down and reset for each cut, and had an average advance speed
of 2.1 ft/min.
48
Chapter 7
Conclusions and Recommendations

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business