Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Effects Assessment
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

Table 3
Range of Reported Home Range Sizes
Range of Reported Values
Common
for Home Range Size
Name
Scientific Name
square kilometers
Actitis macularia
Sandpiper
~ 0.0025
Lutra canadensis
River otter
2.95 to 4.0
Pandion haliaetus
Osprey
9.1 to 314
(4) Migration. A species that migrates away from the disposal site may
have more limited exposure than a local nonmigratory species.
Migratory patterns could also bring a species under the influence of
a dredged material management site during a particularly vulnerable
life stage (i.e., breeding period, larval development, etc.). Such
limited, but possibly critical, exposures may present significant
sources of uncertainty in estimating exposure. Avoidance or
attraction of wildlife to dredging or disposal sites also may
influence their exposure to COCs.
Overall, a moderate degree of uncertainty is associated with
parameters that describe the exposure duration of ecological
receptors (USEPA 1993c). Additional information that would
reduce this uncertainty could be obtained through field surveys and
laboratory measurements.
(5) Time-activity patterns for workers. There is both uncertainty and
variability in specifying the exact time-activity patterns of workers.
Time-activity patterns are an important component of estimating
exposures to contaminants in dredged materials. The most reliable
estimates will be obtained based on site-specific information. With
this information, the magnitude of uncertainty should be low and
easily quantified.
Effects Assessment
Toxicity end points for ecological receptors
Toxicity end points for mammalian and avian species have been evaluated
and compiled in "Toxicological Benchmarks for Wildlife: 1996 Revision"
(Sample, Opresko, and Suter 1996). Relatively few of the studies included in this
compilation determined safe levels (no observed adverse effect levels
(NOAELs)) for exposures in which wildlife were chronically exposed over an
entire lifetime or several generations. Although USEPA has no clear definition
for the duration of a chronic exposure, some approaches assume that a chronic
exposure is equal to at least 50 percent of a species' life span. In many cases,
however, the only information available is from short-term or subchronic
experiments on laboratory species (e.g., mice and rats). Estimating an NOAEL
45
Chapter 5 Uncertainty in Tier IV Risk Assessments

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business