|
|
assessment. Subsequent sections describe how these two categories of risk
assessment differ.
Risk assessment in its more common manifestations is an often used, although
not necessarily formally recognized, component of the dredged material
management decision-making process. For example, Peddicord et al. (1997) note
that the present procedure for evaluating water column impacts in dredged material
evaluations (USEPA/USACE 1991, 1998) is an application of ecological risk
assessment.
In its most basic form, risk assessment means answering several simple
questions which usually underlie dredged material management decisions. These
include:
a. Are there humans, organisms, or habitats (all called receptors) near the
proposed dredged material management activities?
b. Are there chemicals or physical hazards associated with the proposed
dredged material which may affect the survival or reproduction of these
receptors? The answer to this question is called a hazard identification.
c. Is there a known quantity of the chemical or physical hazard which results
in an adverse effect to the likely receptors? This is called toxicity
assessment or effects assessment.
d. Are there any conservative, but realistic, activities or physical and
biological pathways by which the receptors may encounter the chemical or
physical hazards associated with a particular proposed dredged material
activity? This is termed exposure assessment.
e. Finally, under a specified set of conditions, will this encounter result in an
exposure to the chemical or physical hazard at a level known to cause an
adverse effect? (Risk characterization).
Generally, if the answer to this last question is no, then we assume that the risk
associated with the dredged material management decision is acceptable. If it is yes,
then there is some potential unacceptable risk, and we begin to search for ways to
modify management activities or receptor activities to lower the exposure and hence
risk. The decision maker asks one additional question:
f. How confident are we in our answer? (Uncertainty analysis).
Viewed as a formal approach to answering these simple and commonly posed
questions, risk assessment appears as a familiar thought process. Also, dredged
material managers and USACE field operations personnel will recognize that the
information necessary to answer these questions is nearly always available from
data developed as part of the site selection process and tiered evaluation process
described in the Dredged Material Testing Manuals (USEPA/USACE 1991, 1998).
6
Chapter 1 Overview of Ecological and Human Health Risk
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing |