|
|
Appendix G is a Glossary of Terms. Often, and contrary to USEPA directive to
be transparent, discussion of risk assessment is obfuscated with technical jargon and
"terms of art." This appendix attempts to provide definitions for such terms in
simple business English and emphasizes the initial use of the term in bold italics.
Background
The USACE navigation mission entails maintenance and improvement of 40,225
km of channels, supporting a vital component of the Nation's transportation
infrastructure system. These waterways serve 400 ports, including 130 of the
Nation's 150 largest cities
The USACE dredge and/or permit for dredging an annual average of 191 to 229
million cu m of sediment from this navigation system at an annual cost of $400 to
$600 million. Dredging is the single most costly item in the Corps' Civil Works
budget. Corps grants are also permitted to the private sector for dredging and
disposing of an additional 764,600 cu m of sediment.
These dredged sediments, especially in urbanized and industrial harbors, may
exhibit high concentrations of various contaminants from years of unregulated
discharge and runoff. Selecting appropriate management options for contaminated
sediment is a difficult task, exacerbated by the rapidly diminishing capacity of
existing management locations and by public resistance to construction of new
facilities in traditional locations. Management options are quickly disappearing, and
the seasonal periods available for dredging are increasingly constrained by
environmental windows and other restrictions for the protection of sensitive aquatic
resources and wildlife.
Today's dredging manager faces a complex situation requiring a cost-efficient
operation which simultaneously considers the risks associated with various types of
dredging equipment, timing of dredging and management operations, selection of an
appropriate management alternative, and determining the relative importance of
ecological impacts from the management operation.
Fiscal constraints add further difficulty to a district's maintenance
dredging/management program. The use of risk management can facilitate the
efficient use of limited funds through evaluation of critical factors (e.g., cost,
equipment, windows, contaminants, disposal options, shoaling and channel
navigability, etc.) as well as the consequence of not dredging. This document
develops a repeatable and defendable framework to assess the risks from exposure
to contaminants in aquatic systems associated with management options.
What is Risk Assessment?
Risk assessment is the process of evaluating the impact of a stressor (e.g., a
chemical or physical condition) upon the health of individual humans or the
environmental well-being of a population or community of animals and plants. The
former is called human health risk assessment, and the latter is called ecological risk
5
Chapter 1 Overview of Ecological and Human Health Risk
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing |