Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Select and characterize human receptors
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

material management site. Using a representative species approach is a commonly
accepted technique in regulatory practice. For example, this approach has
historically been used in other Clean Water Act regulatory activities such as 301h
and 301b demonstrations.
Select and characterize human receptors
The assessment should specify the human receptors who may use the
management site, local residents living or working near the site, and workers who
may contact sediments during dredging, transport, or management of the materials.
Obviously, the types of human receptors will vary with the technology employed in
the dredged material management activity and the location of the activity. The likely
list of potential human receptors include:
a. Potential recreational users of the site (swimmers, boaters, fishermen,
naturalists, waders).
b. Local residents (off-site resident, trespasser - depends on proximity of
management site to shore).
c. Workers (barge operators, onsite workers, facility workers, pretreatment
workers - depends on the technology used).
Select ecological receptors
This step identifies the receptor species and provides the rationale for their
selection as representative receptors from among the species likely to occur in the
disposal site area.
The actual receptors chosen will vary among disposal sites. However, general
guidance for receptor selection is to select those species which:
a. Are likely to occur at the site.
b. Represent a reasonable (although not comprehensive) cross section of the
major functional and structural components of the ecosystem under study.
c. Represent various trophic levels (e.g. saprophytes, herbivores, primary and
secondary carnivores), feeding types (detritivores, scavengers, filter feeders,
active predators, forage fish, piscivorous birds), and habitats (benthic,
demersal, pelagic) so that exposure pathways can be evaluated.
d. Represent those types of organisms most likely to encounter the
contaminants of concern.
e. Are relatively abundant and ecologically important within the selected
habitats.
f. Have available applicable toxicological literature.
38
Chapter 2 Problem Formulation

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business