|
|
If there is no potential for risk, according to these criteria, then there is no
further action or investigation is warranted.
The Oregon DEQ is currently working on a probabilistic risk assessment
guidance document for human health risk assessment. The draft is currently being
reviewed locally and should be available for wider review by the end of August
1997 (Oregon DEQ 1998). The State currently uses the EPA's CERCLA
documents for human health risk assessments.
Texas
Document:
"Texas Risk Reduction Program." Prepared by Texas Natural
Resources Conservation Commission. (TNRCC 1996a).
Contact:
TNRCC, Office of Waste Management, Austin, TX.
The Texas Risk Reduction Program for evaluation of human health risks
follows the risk-based corrective action (RBCA) process developed by the
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). This document uses a tiered
approach to determine risk-based concentration levels for certain contaminant
levels at a hazardous waste site. These risk-based concentration levels are
protective of human health. Also, the document specifies three "remedy
standards" (risk management options) are given. The three options are:
1. Unrestricted Land Use - Permanent Remedy.
2. Restricted Land Use - Remedy with Controls.
3. No Active Land Use - Remedy with Controls.
The risk-based concentration levels are applied to one of these remedy
standards to assess the risk to human health posed by a particular site. Three
sections of this document (TNRCC 1996a) discuss procedures regarding
determination of human health risk.
Section 4.4 describes how to determine human health risk limits and risk
characterization.
The points of exposure (air, soil, groundwater, surface water) for each remedy
standard are discussed in Section 5.4.
Section 7.1 explains the tiered process for the development of human health-
based protective concentration levels.
In this tiered approach, the type of land use, remedy standards, and
groundwater class specific to a site are first determined. The next step is a Tier I
screening level evaluation. At each tier, exposure pathways and chemicals of
concern, site parameters, protective concentration levels (PCLs) and PCL
exceedance are determined. If a risk assessor cannot rule out the potential for
harm to human health at the site in Tier I, he or she proceeds to a site-specific,
A26
Appendix A Summary of Federal, State, and Regional Guidance
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing |