|
|
presently equipped. One advantage to the configuration was the potential for
making the sand/silt separation on the screen, followed by a finer cut at the
hydrocyclones, thus addressing both size separations of principal interest with
one unit. Tri-Flo also manufactures a mud pump that could be useful for
excavating and slurrying consolidated material. The mud pump is equipped with
an integral screen that prevents the pump from picking up oversize particles.
Principal limitations of the equipment were the potential for blinding of the
screens, the inability of screens to separate coarse organic materials from coarse
minerals, and the fact that this equipment has not been demonstrated for dredged
material or sediments.
MetPro Supply manufactures a self-contained maximum density separator
(MDS) consisting of a trailer-mounted sump, slurry pump, and MDS. Both 0.15-
and 0.3-m (6- and 12-in.) MDS have been demonstrated on sediments in the U.S.
Army Engineer District, Jacksonville. Based on previous testing, MetPro
recommended a 0.61-m (24-in.) MDS to produce a coarse fraction with less than
10 percent fines entrained. A 0.61-m (24-in.) MDS has a throughput of
approximately 4.5 cu m (1,200 gal) per minute (approximately 68,039 kg
(75 tons) solids per hour), and can accept particles up to 25-38 mm (1 1-1/2 in.)
in diameter, thus simplifying prescreening. Dry or slurried material could be fed
to the sump, with adjustments to the volume of makeup water supplied. The
MDS differs from a conventional hydrocyclone in that a flexible sleeve is
attached to the apex of the cone, and a vacuum is applied to the overflow line,
thus restricting discharge of underflow until sufficient weight accumulates to
force discharge. This reportedly results in a higher solids underflow.
Because of the potential variability in feed requirements, the offerors were
tasked with providing the necessary auxiliary equipment to support the proposed
separation unit, in effect developing a compatible treatment train. Mechanical
excavation and prescreening were to be handled by the Detroit District.
Auxiliary equipment was located in the Green Bay/Milwaukee area. A
powerscreen for prescreening material; water supply pump; flexible, quick-
coupling water hoses; and generator were available and obtained as short-term
rentals.
Because the target separation of the proposed equipment was 75 m, it was
necessary to locate material containing sufficient sand to permit evaluation of the
efficiency of the equipment in making this separation. Based on anecdotal
information, Cell 5 was initially identified as containing sandy material from the
outer harbor. Core and near-surface bulk samples were taken from Cell 5 for
evaluation. However, finer material had apparently been placed over the target
material, and the near-surface dredged material contained little sand. Additional
samples were therefore taken for evaluation from Cell 4, where additional coarse
material had recently been placed. (This material was from an inner harbor
dredging project, and may not be representative of outer harbor sandy sedi-
in subsequent sections of this report. Approximately 380 cu m (500 cu yd) were
1
Dean Haen, Personal Communication, 5 November 2001, Port Manager, Brown County
Port and Solid Waste Department (Port of Green Bay), Green Bay, WI.
7
Chapter 2 Project Description
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing |