Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: 3.2.3 Dredged Material Characteristics
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

3.2.3 Dredged Material Characteristics
The general characteristics of the dredged material should be described from
the perspective of factors that might indicate the presence, type, and mobility of
COC in the material. Such factors may include, for example:
Area from which the material will be dredged.
Land use in the watershed and local area surrounding the source.
Known spills or discharges in the area.
Physical characteristics of the material (grain-size distribution, water
content, plasticity indexes, etc.).
Volume of material to be dredged.
Dredging schedule.
Project dredging history.
Salinity at the dredging site.
Maintenance or new work material.
Method of dredging and placement.
3.2.4 Identifying Relevant Pathways
Once the site and CDF characteristics are identified, every migration pathway
for which COC may be of concern should be evaluated for relevance before
proceeding further in the tiered testing process. The nature of each pathway
should be considered in relation to the CDF characteristics (Section 3.2.2) and
dredged material characteristics (Section 3.2.3). The purpose at this initial stage
is to eliminate pathways that clearly do not warrant evaluation; unless this is clear,
the evaluation should continue. Examples in which pathways would not warrant
evaluation include situations such as the following:
If the CDF will be paved when the project being evaluated is completed,
runoff, volatilization, and direct uptake pathways would not warrant
evaluation for that project. However, these pathways may warrant
evaluation for projects that will not be paved upon completion or during
filling prior to paving.
If the frequency of CDF use will be sufficient to keep plants and animals
from becoming established within the CDF, the direct uptake pathways
would not warrant evaluation.
3-4
Chapter 3
Initial Evaluations

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business