Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: 5.1.2 Influence of CDF Design and Operation on Runoff
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

5.1.2 Influence of CDF Design and Operation on Runoff
The method of filling can affect the erosiveness of the dredged material, the
rate of runoff, and resulting suspended solids generation. Hydraulic disposal
tends to provide a smoother surface while mechanical disposal from a conveyor or
truck tends to provide a rougher surface unless altered by grading equipment.
Most runoff studies to date have addressed the hydraulic disposal option. No data
have been gathered to determine if there is any significant difference in runoff
characteristics as a result of mechanical disposal. It is assumed that although
suspended solids generation may be different between disposal options, the effects
on soluble contaminants would not be significantly affected and the current testing
approach is suitable for both.
5.1.3 Regulatory Considerations
If there is a reason to believe that surface water runoff might contain
contaminants, evaluations using this chapter will be required. As defined, surface
water runoff is considered as a discharge of dredged material to waters of the
United States and is subject to the same nationwide permit as effluent discharge,
requiring Section 401 Water Quality Certification. The water quality certification
issues for surface runoff should be addressed at the same time that certification is
obtained for the effluent discharge.
In addition to typical contaminants, WQS may exist for nutrients and physical
parameters such as turbidity or TSS. Chlorides should be considered a potential
COC whenever there is the potential for runoff from saline dredged material to
enter a fresh water system.
5.1.4 Mixing Zones
As for effluent, the evaluation of runoff discharges should consider the effects
of mixing and dispersion. Mixing zones are normally defined by the State
regulatory agency as part of the CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification
requirements. When runoff enters receiving waters, it is dispersed by natural
physical processes so that the concentration decreases spatially and temporally
beyond the point of entry. This phenomenon is important in determining the
potential for effects, because effects depend on both the concentration to which
organisms are exposed and the length of time for which they are exposed. Effects
are generally less at lower exposure concentrations or shorter exposure times, and
for each COC, there are exposure time-concentration combinations below which
effects do not occur. The Federal regulations implementing Section 404(b)(1) of
the Clean Water Act (40 CFR 230) recognize this and explicitly provide for
consideration of mixing in evaluating dredged material releases.
Mixing calculations describe the spatial and temporal boundaries within
which the discharge will reach the WQS. If these boundaries are within the
established mixing zone limits, there should not be an effect. If these boundaries
exceed the established mixing zone limits, there may be an effect.
5-3
Chapter 5
Surface Runoff After Disposal Operations

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business