Order this information in Print

Order this information on CD-ROM

Download in PDF Format

     

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Viability of capping as an alternative
Back | Up | Next

Click here for a printable version

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Combat
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
USMC
   
Products
  Educational CD-ROM's
Printed Manuals
Downloadable Books
   

 

material at an open-water site. Several issues, therefore, must be carefully
considered within the context of a capping project design. These include
the following:
a. Potential water column impacts during placement. Assessment
should consider evaluation of potential release of contaminants to
the water column, evaluation of potential water column toxicity,
and evaluation of initial mixing. Elutriate test procedures for
water quality, water column bioassay tests, and computer models
for dispersion and mixing are available to address these require-
ments. The mass loss of contaminants during placement (fraction
dispersed offsite and remaining uncapped) may also be predicted
using these same tests and models.
b. Efficacy of cap placement. Assessment should consider available
capping materials, methods for dredging and placement of both
contaminated material and cap material, compatibility of site condi-
tions, material physical properties, and dredging and placement
techniques. Guidance on selection of appropriate methods, com-
patibility with site conditions and material properties, and com-
puter models for predicting mound development and spreading
behavior are available.
c. Long-term cap integrity. Assessment should consider the physical
isolation of contaminants, potential bioturbation of the cap by ben-
thos, consolidation of the sediments, long-term contaminant flux
through the cap due to advection/diffusion, and potential for physi-
cal disturbance or erosion of the cap by currents, waves, and other
forces such as anchors, ship traffic, ice, etc. Test procedures for
contaminant isolation and consolidation and computer models for
evaluation of long-term contaminant flux, consolidation, and resis-
tance to erosion are available.
Each of these issues must be appropriately addressed by the project design.
Viability of capping as an alternative
Capping is only one of several alternatives that may be considered for
dredged material that is excessively contaminated and would need isola-
tion from the benthic environment if proposed for open-water placement.
If the issues described above can be satisfactorily addressed in the project
design for the specific set of sediment, site, and operational conditions un-
der consideration, capping is a technically viable option.
Capping is not a technically viable option for a specific set of sediment,
site, and operational conditions described below:
a. Contaminant release and dispersion behavior of the contaminated
material (even with consideration of controls) results in unaccept-
able water column impacts during placement.
5
Chapter 1 Introduction

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us - Support Integrated Publishing

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business